Marina de Oliveira Emerick

Graduate Student
Western
Email author

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Beat Perception and Motor Performance

Marina Emerick and Jessica Grahn

Hi there! 
Welcome to my poster session!
My name is Marina and I'm a second-year master's student at the Grahn Lab (Western University) working under Dr. Jessica Grahn's supervision. I'm mostly interested in music cognition, especially in beat perception. My research includes stimulating different brain areas with tDCS during a rhythm reproduction task.
I look forward to seeing you and answering any questions on August 9th!

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Beat Perception and Motor Performance

Marina Emerick and Jessica Grahn
Abstract

Humans have an intrinsic tendency to move to music, perhaps because motor brain areas respond to beat perception. However, our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying the music-movement connection remains limited, and most studies have used correlational methods. Here, we investigated the role of four motor brain regions involved in the timing of movement and beat perception: the supplementary motor area (SMA), the left and right premotor cortex (PMC), and the right cerebellum, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). TDCS is a causal method that modulates brain responses in two opposite directions: anodal stimulation increases cortical excitability, and cathodal stimulation inhibits cortical excitability. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive stimulation in one of the four brain regions. They participated in three sessions separated from two to seven days, receiving anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation in each session while they reproduced different types of rhythmic sequences. In part of the sequences, a beat was easily perceived; in the other part, the beat was unclear or not present. As the SMA plays a primary role in beat perception, while the premotor cortex and cerebellum appear to have a general role in timing, we predicted that the SMA stimulation would affect reproduction of rhythms with a beat, whereas premotor and cerebellar stimulation would affect reproduction of sequences with no beat. As expected, improved reproduction was observed according to whether the rhythm had a beat or not, but no difference was found based on the stimulation received. Thus, we find no evidence that modulating brain excitability alters accuracy of rhythm reproduction. We discuss the implications of these results and the future perspectives for this research.